Solitude and Relationship

We spoke previously of the challenge of loneliness and how it can be made more difficult and painful from the isolation that results from the current pandemic. This situation invites us to reach out in whatever ways possible to make contact with one another. It also calls us to recognize that, for a variety of reasons, many people can become more withdrawn and unable to reach out, and need others to reach in to them.

At the same time a counterpart to and response to loneliness is what may be called solitude. We are each a unique person, and there are no carbon copies of any of us. We are also quite complex, with a vast variety of backgrounds, life-situations, experiences, reactions, thoughts, feelings, and much more. We are to a considerable extent a puzzle, a question, a mystery to ourselves, as well as to one another. Solitude, time spent quietly by oneself is a way to journey to and get in touch with our inmost self.

We have also mentioned the contrast between homelessness and homefulness with ourselves. It is easy to live on the outskirts of our lives, immersed in busyness and externals, and endlessly striving to meet the expectations of others or our society. This approach only increases our loneliness, our experience of being an absentee landlord in our own home.

Solitude, distinct from loneliness, is a time of quietness by ourselves. It may be initially uncomfortable, but if we are able to be immersed in life with awareness and openness, that time in our own company can be a time to reflect on our life, our experiences, our relationships, our place in society.

One helpful and yet possibly at first unnerving question is: “Where do you live?” We can ask this question beyond the immediate sense of our street or city location. In a conversation with my son at the age of seven, he spoke of the world inside us in terms of different towns. He spoke of happy town and excitement town and the like, with examples for each. I asked him if there was anything further, and he said that way, way at the back was love town. I suggested to him that as long as we know that there is a love town we will be alright even if we cannot always be there, but are for a time in lonely town or angry town.

This story may helpful for asking in which town we live. Is it lonely town or the town of fear or hostility or anxiety or hope or love. Do we move among different towns, or are we stuck, so to speak, in one of them. In what town would we like to make our home, and how do we get there? What is the deepest place in us, and are we there seldom or often.

If we try to spend some quiet time by ourselves, we may at first feel uncomfortable. We may recognize that we are in fact living most of the time in hurt or fear or angry town. I think that these are part of all our experiences. At the same time, we may also gradually be aware of something in us that is deeper than all of these feelings. It is who we are beneath and beyond and more than these. We may also sense that this is a place of sacredness and worth, even if we are seldom there. And it is our real home.

One writer, Gordon Cosby, extending it beyond experiences of quiet time by ourselves, puts it this way: “In our deepest beings we are all contemplatives. We glimpse what this means in times when we surrendered ourselves to a piece of work and the hours seems as moments. We are contemplatives when we are absorbed by an experience of love, beauty, wonder, grief, or when we are able to be present to something or someone with the totality of ourselves. “

Erich Fromm, in his book on the meaning of love, The Art of Loving, says that our common notion of activity involves doing something external to ourselves. He says that such busyness may come from being driven, whether by anxiety, greed, insecurity and the like. Being truly active means that, whatever we do, including sitting quietly, comes freely from within ourselves, not compelled from without. He later adds that genuine communication with another also depends upon its flowing freely from within.

In Fromm’s words: “Love is possible only if two persons communicate with each other from the centre of their existence, hence if each of them experiences themselves from the centre of their existence. …Even whether there is harmony or conflict, joy or sadness, is secondary to the fundamental fact that two people experience themselves from the centre of their existence, that they are one with each other by being one with themselves, rather than fleeing from themselves.”

We might say that we are truly free when we are at home to our inmost self and can then be truly at home to and even a home for one another. We can speak more of friendship in future reflections but leave things here at this point. May you find your true home within yourselves and live there and from there, and become more and more a home for one another.

Norman King, January 11, 2021

New Beginnings

T. S. Eliot has written: The end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.”

The beginning of a new calendar year, near the beginning of winter also marks the time when the days begin to get longer and we move towards new life, in the sense of the renewal which comes with springtime. For thousands of years, people’s lives had been structured by the rotation of the seasons. It was a time of endings and new beginnings, just as plants and flowers whose endings also release the seeds of new life and growth

Yet as Eliot observes and as The Wizard of Oz expresses, a new beginning is always a return home. Yet that return is at once the same the same and different, because we are also both the same and different. We are changed, however imperceptibly, by the living out of our lives and by the experiences they contain. At the same time, we may move more and more beyond the surface of life, marked by externals and busyness. We may then discover different parts and dimensions of ourselves that have previously remained unknown to us.

The folk tales portray these discoveries of parts of ourselves as meeting with strangers, both helpers and threats. In The Wizard of Oz, the scarecrow, the tin man, and the lion represent the wisdom, love, and courage that is already within us, yet still to be discovered. The good and evil witches represent the creative or life-giving and the destructive or death-dealing forces with us. The challenge is to recognize and be in touch with all these dimensions, without either denying our sacred worth or unleashing harm on ourselves or others.

To return home, to find a new starting place, and make a new beginning, is to become aware of all these dimensions and tendencies and qualities that are part of who we are. It is to become at home with all that we are, both our strengths and our limitations. It is also to find in friendship a place in another’s heart where we can be at once safe and vulnerable, where we can be at home both to ourselves and to one another. It is out of this raw material, so to speak, that we are to fashion our lives into a creative work of art.

On Sunday, I listened to a podcast from the On Being program, accessible on U.S. public radio and on host Krista Tippett’s website: www.onbeing.org. It was an interview with Gaelynn Lea, who has a brittle bone disease that has left her small and in a wheel chair, but able to excel in playing the fiddle held like a cello. She commented that the present commercial society attempts to make people feel inadequate about themselves, so that they will that lead them closer to an artificial ideal. She adds: “And you just make the bar unattainable enough so that people will keep striving after it and never really be satisfied with who they are, so they’ll spend tons of money.”
This approach reflects the thought that we have been given the image of people, of ourselves, as human “havings” rather than human “beings.” As a result, we are always drawn to look outside ourselves, and so never to be at home with ourselves, Always to be homeless in our own lives.

When, with one another’s help, we can come to be at home to all that is within us, and grow into a sense of our sacred worth, that embraces all of us , “warts and all,” we will at times come to be at peace with ourselves and with one another.

The experience of solitude and of friendship are pathways to this homefulness. And it is reflected also in the story of Rumpelstiltzkin. These are topics we may speak about in future weeks. For now, I’ll just mention that Rumpelstiltzkin does express the basic challenge of life: to spin straw into gold. I see its meaning as the challenge accept our lives which may seem brief and passing like straw, and to fashion them into gold, into a lasting work of art, by how we weave our life story. In an age of machinery and possessions, the story utters a profound reminder: “Something living is more precious than all the gold in the world.”

May you come to experience and live more fully the preciousness of your own lives.

Norman King, January 4, 2021

Presence beyond Walls

We have spoken recently about being at home to ourselves and to one another. We spoke to of loneliness, its forms and challenges. I hope that this Christmas has not been too difficult for you and that you have had some meaningful contact with those you care about and who care about you.
What can prevent us from being present and at home to ourselves and to one another are the defensive walls we build around ourselves. Among these are what might be called the walls of deadness that can stifle the life inside us. In that situation , someone must see beyond these walls to the possibility of new life and call that forth in us. One example is the problem of isolation occasioned by illness, age, or other issues, readily made worse by the pervasive covid virus. Here it can require us or another to see that someone is more than the limitations that imprison them, and to reach caringly beyond them in whatever ways are presently possible. To do so requires that we discern that the sacred worth of a person–including ourselves–is rooted in who we are rather than what we have or do.
Sometimes we even put up walls to our friends, While true friends are able to pass through these walls, it may be advisable to respect these walls, these defences that they may need at one time or another, But we recognize that they are more than such walls. We tune into the person behind these walls and our caring reaches to that person. Sometimes we may help that person to feel, or another may make us feel, that in each other’s presence we do not need any walls, that we are a safe place for each other, because we are valued as who we are.
One reason we build walls around ourselves is because of our fears. Certainly our fears and how we might respond to them is topic of its own. Here we might just say that our experience of limits, weakness, and even wrong, might creates doubts in us about our own worth. It is perhaps this fear that we are of little value that most paralyses us. We need one another to affirm our worth as deeper, more enduring, and unassailable by anything or anyone.
I once suggested that around our core and sacred self are three walls: a wall of hurt, a wall of fear, and a wall of hostility. If we live inside of any of these walls, we tend to hurt ourselves and others. We are, in effect, homeless and lonely, because we are away from ourselves. The challenge is gradually, with one another’s help, to become more and more at home to our inmost self. There is a very striking line from a story by James Joyce. It reads: “Mr. Duffy lived a short distance from his body.” It seems to mean being disconnected, being disconnected from feelings, thoughts, emotions, senses and everything about who we are, as well as from people and the world around us.
The Latin roots of the words “presence” and “absence” are instructive here. ”Presence” comes from the Latin words “prae” and “ens,” and means literally being there, being all there, being  with. “Absence” comes from the Latin words “ab” and”ens,” and means literally being away from, withdrawn or missing.
The positive challenge is to be there from our inmost centre and with all that we are, to ourselves and to another. To be present to ourselves is to be open to all that is within us. It is allowing ourselves to experience every nook and cranny of our being, every tendency, every memory, every action, so as to arrive beneath these to the home place, the sacred core or centre of who we are, beneath all of these. We perhaps best do this through times of gentle silence by ourselves or trusting and open conversation with another.
When we learn to be at home to ourselves, we can be at home to and for another. We do not have walls and fences and barriers that prevent their entry. We are able to provide an uncluttered space and a safe place for another to enter and to be. We offer a space of compassion around another person and we are open to who that person is, without an agenda, and without an agenda that seeks to adjust or mould them, to use them, to meet our alleged and surface needs. That openness to who another is includes an invitation to become who they are and can be.
Genuine presence to another is also an openness to let who that person is affect, modify, change, and even transform who we are. To be truly present to you, I must allow who you are to affect who I am. In effect, I open the doors of my soul to you in trust. The opposite is when I remain closed to who you are, refusing to be shaped by your presence, or else trying to invade your soul from behind the locked doors of my own. I then act from mistrust, and possibly even violate your trust.
In a wider sense, to be present is to be open to life itself, to experience life in all its obscurity, ambiguity, and complexity, and in its gift character and sacredness that is deeper than and encompasses all else. And if we sense that life is vaster and more mysterious than all of our present answers, then we will be open to listen to life, rather than try to shout (or shut) it down.
The basic form of friendship, and of all form of creative caring for another is presence. It is being with another. Built upon that, but never replacing it, are the particular gifts with a person is endowed and has developed with the help of caring others, as well as the concrete situation and circumstances within which we find ourselves. We respond to one another first of all with who we are, then in terms of our gifts, and then in terms of what is appropriate to the situation. Josef Pieper in his book, About Love, says that before and more than the qualities that another person may have, the basic experience of love is that it is good that the other person  is, and that it is good to be with that person.
In terms of the idea of presence, openness, to life itself, perhaps what is crucial is to follow our deepest longings while recognizing our limitations, to be true to our own inmost truth while receiving the deepest truth of others. Rather than try to fit others–and life–into our present level of thought, feeling, and action, we are challenged to remain ever open, with an openness to be transformed by life, and by the mystery at the heart of life.
May you find a peaceful home within yourself and in one another that allows your life to unfold from within freely with awareness and compassion for yourself and others,
Norman King, December 28, 2020

The Challenge of Loneliness in a Time of Increased Isolation

It was suggested to me that during this time of increased and prolonged isolation, that words about loneliness and ways to respond to it might be helpful. Certainly nothing can replace physical presence, simply being with someone next to us, for hugs and/or conversation. Yet notes, phone calls, and even text messages or use of the so-called social media can be helpful. At the same time, many people do not have access to these forms, other than phone calls or letters. Sometimes, too, as persons get more and more isolated through sickness or even just the aging process, it can become harder to reach out. It requires someone else to take the initiative and reach in. Kindness, even when met with resistance, can always be helpful.

Many years ago, a young woman in class told of how she took her dog to long term care homes and to prisons. Her dog was always welcoming and friendly to whomever she met. On prisoner remarked how the dog did not know he had a criminal record and was in no way offset by that fact. Another sad case occurred when an elderly woman who obviously wanted to pet the dog refused to do so. The young woman realized that this person had virtually no choice in her institutional situation, no capacity to say no. This occasion was virtually the only one in which she could exercise a right to refuse. The incident highlighted the need for the possibility of decision-making, even in situations of confinement. It also illustrated the need for companionship, for affection, for closeness, that is essential to all of us.

A number of years ago, a colleague and I published an article on spirituality and chronic illness which noted some needs and concerns arising from illness, accident, or disability. One result is increasing isolation and the deep-seated loneliness it can occasion. Continued care for personal hygiene, good grooming, and personal appearance are helpful to maintain a person’s sense of self-respect and dignity. This effort can help people who are confined both to reach out and also to feel more comfortable in allowing others to approach them.

The diminishing of activity caused by physical limitations is also a cause of difficulty. Today it is more and more widespread because of the continuing incidence of Covid 19. Here it is important to provide those who are confined with possible outreach activities. It may be helpful to send notes and cards to others, to make telephone calls, to write emails or messages, or even to work on sudoku or word puzzles. A powerful example is that of the late Stephen Hawking, who continued his scientific work and communication through a voice synthesizer.

More profoundly, a change in mindset is called for. In recent decades there has bee n a growing tendency to regard ourselves as human “havings” and human “doings” rather than human “beings.” there is a tendency to forget that the greatest gift we have to offer one another is our presence. It is not what we have or do but who we are that counts the most. I recall that, some thirty years ago, as I sat with my dying mother, the expression came to mind: :Don’t just stand there, do something.” It struck me that, in this situation, the opposite is true. “Don’t just do something, stand there.” In other words, simply be there with the person. Don’t just flee into busyness.

This last thought brings to mind that we are essentially relational beings. Who we are is very much bound up with who we are with. Our sense of identity is very much bound up with our relationship with others. We discover who we are and our sacred worth especially from those who care about us and about whom we care. As we mentioned in discussing the story of Snow White, while we cannot see ourselves with our own eyes, we are best “mirrored” to ourselves by someone who intelligently and deeply cares for us. And we too can provide such a mirror for someone we care about. As a result, continuing contact and communication that comes from our core rather than our surface is crucial, in whatever forms are possible in this time of isolation.

While addressing this kind of loneliness, and only in connection with doing so, it is also important gradually to realize that there is also an underlying loneliness that comes from our human condition itself. Paradoxically, recognizing and living with this reality can be a source of creativity and meaningful relationships.

The story of Rapunzel provides a wonderful example. She is initially isolated in a nearly inaccessible tower. Yet, we are told, out of her loneliness she sings and the beauty of her voice rings throughout the forest. There it reaches and touches the heart of a young man who then seeks and succeeds in meeting her, only to be cruelly separated. If our loneliness can lead us to be in touch with and to express our inmost self, as Rapunzel does in singing, it can make possible an authentic relationship with others. The story ends with a marvellous insight. Rapunzel rushes to embrace her husband from whom she has been separated and who has wandered blindly through the forest. He hears her singing once again and stumbles into her presence. Two of her tears fall on his eyes and restore their sight. Our own wounds, creatively bo9rne, can be a source of vision and healing for others.

Clark Moustakas wrote an extremely insight ful book, simply entitled, Loneliness. Here are a few of his thoughts.
“Loneliness is a condition of human life, an experience of being human which enables the individual to sustain, extend, and deepen his or her humanity. .. [Yet despite its pain, fear or terror, loneliness] brings into awareness new dimensions of self, new beauty, new power for human compassion, and a reverence for the precious nature of each breathing moment. … I have concluded that loneliness is within life itself, and that all creations in some way spring from solitude, meditation, and isolation. … In loneliness persons commune with themselves and come to grips with their own being. They discover life, who they are, what they really want, the meaning of their existence, the true nature of their relations with others. …Within pain and isolation and loneliness, one can find courage and hope and what is brave and lovely and true in life.”

May you learn evermore to be in touch with and at home to yourself, and to express yourself more and more creatively, and gradually deepen and enhance your relationship with all whose lives intersect with your own.
Norman King, December 21, 2020.

The Gift and Flowering of Life

I thought that this week I would look at a story that came to mind, that we have often discussed in class. It’s called The Gift. What brought this story to mind was the reflection on silence and sacred space, as well as some of your responses. That silence, hopefully, filters gradually through the many layers of self until we experience our core self as gift, as meaningful word out of the infinite silence enveloping all that is. And we may experience ourselves as called to provide that same sacred space around one another, a space that may seem empty, yet is filled with compassion. This experience is perhaps often crowded out by the hassles of life. We need not feel guilty about that, just grateful if its occasionally emerges.

The story of The Gift is just a few lines long.
In one seat on the bus a wispy old man sat holding a bunch of fresh flowers. Across the aisle was a young woman whose eyes came back again and again to the man’s flowers. The time came for the old man to get off. Impulsively he handed the flowers to the young woman,. “I can see you love the flowers,” he explained, “and I think my wife would like for you to have them. I’ll tell her I gave them to you.” She accepted the flowers, then watched the old man get off the bus and walk through the gate of a small cemetery.

It is like a parable in that the last line evokes surprise and sheds light on the whole preceding narrative. There is no conversation in the story until the old man offers the young woman the flowers. His words come out of his silence, yet also his awareness of the young woman’s appreciation of the flowers. Silence fosters awareness and it is out of such silence that may come more meaningful words.

The gift he gives is most concretely the flowers, but even more so all that they contain. As we discover, they contain the love he has shared with his late wife. They reveal something about the old man as well: the love he has shared with his wife does not end with her death; his loss and grief have not embittered him and diminished his capacity to love. Yet this love is not confined to his wife; it is not an exclusive but an expansive reality. It is not a possession but a living quality within him. Because the capacity to love that he has learned remains in his heart and continues to grow, he shares it with the young woman.

He offers the flowers and then leaves. His love remains, embodied in the flowers, but he does not. This is a simple expression of a genuine love, one that is not possessive or greedy or overly needy. Perhaps that is something we never learn or achieve completely and perhaps only approach on the other side of life’s sorrows.

Besides being expressive of love, flowers also represent the inseparable beauty and brevity of life, as well as its continuous renewal. After a relatively short time flowers fade, but also contain the seeds of their own renewal. The old man has known both the beauty and the brevity of life and love, its joy and its sorrow. With the flowers, he passes that experience along to the young woman, and in the process experiences as well something of its renewal.

Perhaps it is when the man walks into the cemetery that the young woman realizes the extent of the old man’s gift. With the flowers, she receives the love of the old man, and even that of his late wife who would have wanted her to receive them.

Many people have not received the love that would be called for by their sacredness, even in their childhood. And no one person can give that degree of love to another. Still where people lack a tangible expression of love, it can then be very difficult to realize their own sacred worth. There can be an ongoing struggle with self-doubt and even self-rejection, often without conscious awareness. Yet sometimes a surprise gesture, a token of kindness, the beauty of a flower, the colour of a sunset, or the words or melody of a song, can move us to a glimpse and a gentle stirring of hope that pushes in the direction of our own sacred worth.

The basic gift in the story is the reminder and call to awaken to a grateful awareness that life itself–and our own unique life–is a gift, that it combines joy and sorrow, and that it best unfolds within a context of love; a love that is at once deeply personal, yet moves expansively and non possessively in ever widening circles.

May you all realize more fully your own sacred worth. May you experience the caring from a loved one, a gesture of kindness, the world of music or other arts, or the world of nature, and much else, that makes your sacred worth more tangibly real and secure for you.

Norman King, November 2, 2020

Our True Image and Voice

Recently, I shared a few thoughts on the struggle to move towards a sense of our own sacred worth, which often comes up against our tendency to self-rejection. I referred to stories from the New Testament, with a brief reference to the stories of Narcissus and Sleeping Beauty.

Many of these stories arose within the context of a patriarchal tradition which took for granted that men are superior to women, that women must be in some ways subordinate to men, and that they are suitable only for certain types of work in home or society. Rosemary Ruether makes what is for me a very helpful distinction. She says that, while these stories are inescapably sexist, they have also wrestled with issues of life and death, and we can separate this wrestling from their limited context.

What this approach suggests to me is that we can look at these stories with new eyes. We can explore them from a standpoint of the fundamental equality of all persons yet the uniqueness of each one. We can affirm our common sacred humanity yet respect the diversity in which it is clothed. Within this new angle of vision, we can them explore and accept what they can tell us about what it is to be human and the meaning of our lives. They can help us to live our questions.

In the story of Narcissus, for example, we can look at the situation portrayed by Echo. In the story, perhaps originally suggested by actual echoes, the young woman, Echo, is condemned never to initiate a conversation but only to repeat, to“echo” what she hears. The story suggests that we must discover and speak from our own voice, not just echo the voice of others, of our society, our family, our friends, our nation, or the strangers who pass through our lives. If we do not find and live from our true inner voice, the voice of our sacredness, we will fade away and die. That is, we will never discover and live from what Thomas Merton calls our true self. We will become an impersonator rather than the person we truly are. And among the voices we hear, and perhaps repeat or parrot for most of our life, there is the quiet voice that calls us beloved daughter or son, the voice of our gifted sacredness, and that is the voice to listen to, tune into, and live from. Only then can we become free and fully alive for ourselves and others. We do this, I believe, through a blend of solitude, friendship, and social involvement.

The story of the young man, Narcissus, is perhaps likewise drawn from the experience of the life cycle of a flower by that name. In the story, Narcissus flees from any closeness until one day he sees his reflection in a pond of water, falls in love with it, and yet cannot embrace it. In one version, he falls into the pond and emerges only as narcissus flower whose gold centre stretches toward the sun.

In an insightful interpretation by Thomas Moore, the story is about how we will flee from intimacy, we will not let ourselves be truly loved, and we will inflict hurt on others, unless and until we discover an image ourselves as lovable. The fear of rejection, the fear that we are not enough, leads us to try to fashion an image of ourselves to project to others. This image of what we regard as acceptable becomes a wall behind which we hide. It is a wall of fear which readily becomes a wall of hostility. If we become silent enough we can begin to listen to the voice of our sacredness. Or it can be conveyed to us by another who senses that sacred self beneath these walls.

We then undergo a process of death and rebirth. We die to, that is, let go of the layered images of self that have lived behind walls of fear and hostility, and allow our sacred self to emerge into the light of day. We learn to trust where it is safe and appropriate, and allow ourselves and intelligently trustworthy others to experience our vulnerability. This is not a once and for all experience, but a process that is continually undergone, as the cycles of the season.

Gabor Mate, a physician who helps people recover themselves after childhood trauma or addictions, says that from the beginning of our lives we are drawn both toward authenticity and attachment. Often, however, the need for acceptance leads us, even unknowingly, to sacrifice our authenticity. Yet, he insists, it is never too late to rediscover and live our authenticity. I would add that genuine belonging is not fitting in by presenting an acceptable image of ourselves. It is belonging in our uniqueness–which is perhaps a good understanding of friendship.

In sum, we can look at these stories from the standpoint of our unique sacredness, our shared and equal humanity, and our enriching diversity. And we can ask, what do they tell us about discovering and growing into and sharing our unique personhood and common humanity. And they tell us that we are beings of worth, although it is only on the other side of sorrow and struggle that we can discover and live from our sacred authentic self. Yet as we do so, we will gradually become more free, truthful, trustworthy, loving, and just persons.

Norman King

Naming and Transforming Experience

In a well known expression, Richard Rohr says that suffering that is not transformed is transmitted. The challenge is to acknowledge our own pain rather than inflict it on others. If we are able to become attuned to our own sacred core, deeper than and not overcome by any sorrow, we can move gradually from a genuine self-acceptance and self-caring to a concern for others, those nearest to us, and then those more distant.

Wayne Muller also stresses that there is a certain amount of pain in everyone’s life, sometimes great and sometimes small, like a wind that either blows gently or roars through a persons’s life. Gordon Cosby also adds that most of us have an a great deal of unfaced suffering in our histories that has to be looked at and worked through.

What they all stress is that we are able to face our own pain and not have to run from ourselves and the pain that lives within us. Despite our initial fear and reluctance, if we do so, if we allow our sadness to open our hearts, we will find within us a greater freedom and peace, a fuller sense of who we truly are, deeper than any sorrow, We will find, as Rohr says, that they become sacred wounds rather than disfiguring scars, And we will be freed from becoming cynical and bitter, and from needing to scapegoat others and export to them our unresolved hurt. We can also then become, in Henri Nouwen’s terms, a wounded healer to one another.

I would add that what is often helpful is to entrust our sorrow to a trustworthy other. This is a matter not of inflicting or imposing it upon another as an attack, but rather offering it to another as a gift behind which is our very self. As I have often said as well, it is important that such recognition be in a safe place, which may be a time quietly and non-judgmentally by ourselves as well as with an intelligently caring other. And the naming of such experience can be through image, story, music or other art form.

Of course, there is a whole spectrum of experiences, of joy and love, peace and hope. These are also good to name and entrust. Many years ago, I said that we are transformed by what we let affect us deeply. I think that this means to allow ourselves to experience and come to awareness of all the different dimensions within ourselves. Yet it also suggests that in terms of influences from without that we not be open to everything outside us where there is a choice. This can include something as simple as avoiding listening to too many newscasts to to deciding not to expose ourselves to contacts or relationships that have a toxic impact on us.

Within this framework it seems most meaningful to experience deeply, to name our experience, and to share our experience. And if we realize that our own experience is limited, we may also allow our experience to be enriched and expanded by the named experience of others. Again, perhaps the best naming can come from the images, stories, music, painting, sculpture, architecture, and other art forms, as well as philosophical traditions, and these within as well as outside of religious traditions.

Norman King

Reflections on Voice

REFLECTIONS ON VOICE
In a three way conversation this past week with Jane, her daughter Amy, who teaches drama, and myself, one of the themes that emerged was that of voice, and I found that many valuable thoughts were expressed. As a result, I thought that this week’s reflection might consider the topic of voice, and am greatly indebted to Jane and Amy for many of these thoughts.
I do like etymologies, the roots and origins of words, as a clue to the experience and feeling level within and behind the words we use. The word voice comes from the Latin vox and its verb form vocare. which means to call, to emit or send forth sound, to express from within outwardly. The word “evoke” means to call forth, to summon. Our calling from within both invites and calls forth an acknowledgment, a listening, and a response from another. The related word “vocation” means what we are called from within to be and to do.
What these roots suggest is that our voice is at once an expression of who we are and an outreach to another or others. Our voice is at once personal and relational. These aspects are illustrated in the folk tale, Rapunzel. In her loneliness, Rapunzel sings beautifully, and her voice rings out through the forest where it captivates the young man who hears it. It is the voice that comes from one’s inmost, unique self that at once expresses who we are and evokes a similar response in others. Here, too, that voice is expressed in singing. A contrasting story concerns the figure of Echo in Greek mythology. Echo is condemned only to repeat what she has heard, never to initiate conversation or engage in dialogue. Since she has no voice of her own, she gradually fades away and dies. To be fully alive, a person must find and express their own voice, tell their own story, sing their own song.
As expression and outreach, our voice may be viewed not only as summoned to express its authentic self, but as longing to be heard and acknowledged, to be recognized and listened to attentively. Voice is thus essentially relational: I cannot truly tell my story if no one hears; I cannot fully sing my song if no one listens.
But then the question arises: to what voice within myself do I listen, and to what voices of others do I listen.
There is an interesting story in the New Testament, the baptism of Jesus by John, in which a voice from the clouds proclaims: “This is my beloved son, listen to him.” A common approach envisions a booming voice barking orders from outside, but an approach from what Joseph Campbell calls inner rather than outer geography,suggests something different. In this approach, we might say that we hear many voices within us, voices of judgment, put-down, fault-finding, as well as voices of affirmation and caring. The story suggests that among these many voices within us, is the one that calls us a beloved daughter or son, and that is the voice to listen to. It tells us that the basic truth about ourselves is that we are a beloved son or daughter, that we have a fundamental worth, value, and sacredness that nothing or noone can take away; and that we are called to honour that sacredness in ourselves and others. This view is also found in the story of the Transfiguration of Jesus which tells us that there is a radiance and beauty at the heart of each of us that we may come to experience at certain moments.
The question then arises as to what are the many voices within us, both positive and negative; what is the source of these many voices; which of these voices is our own most inmost, authentic voice; how and to whom do I express that voice; how do I best express that voice, and so on.
The corresponding questions concern the voice of others, from the voice of friends in intimate conversation to the blaring voice of television commercials. I once attended a movie with a friend who averted her eyes during a scene of violence. She explained afterwards that she did not want that kind of image to work on her imagination. A similar question concerns what voices do we wish to allow to reach within and affect us, and what voices do we wish to exclude. We may also ask what are the voices to which we should listen, which we should allow to shape our feeling, imagination, and thought.
In one Peanuts cartoon, Lucy is running after Charlie Brown and threatening to pound him. He replies that if we small children cannot resolve our relatively simple problems without resorting to violence, how do we expect the larger world issues to be solved. Lucy then punches him and remarks to a friend that she had to hit him because he was beginning to make sense. In other words, we may sometimes block out voices that we need to hear and heed. These may well be the voices of those who are most vulnerable in our society. In any event, our own experience is limited and our awareness needs to be stretched and expanded by the articulated experience of others.
There are a myriad of other questions that arise on the theme of voice. Perhaps most basic is the question, expressed above, of how we discover what is our own unique authentic voice and how do we best express that voice in a way that is life-giving and life-enhancing for ourselves and others. One challenge is to allow each of the voices within us to speak, to sing their song, but let none become a soloist who drowns out all the others, and let only the beloved daughter or son be the director of this chorus.
Equally important is the matter of to what other voices we should listen, either personally, or through writings and other arts, the mass media, the so-called social media, and the like. One brief thought is that we should not be taken in by the voices that try to speak manipulatively or with hostility or to hook into our fears and anxieties. Rather we best discern and heed those voices that speak to rather than at us, and that speak with honesty and truthfulness andcompassion. At the same time, it may be helpful to try to discern the fear or hurt behind the stridently hostile voices.
As I have often said, we are transformed by what we let affect us deeply. The question then is: what or who should we or should we not allow to affect us deeply.
Norman King